LIABILITY
david hornby
SCOPE
Under
certain circumstances a third party who has suffered economic loss as
a result of the valuer's negligence can claim damages from the
valuer. In Hedley Byrne v Heller (1964) the House of Lords
held that a negligent, though honest misrepresentation spoken or
written may give rise to an action for damages for financial loss
incurred by anybody who acted upon it. This is because there is a
general duty of care imposed on a person who possesses special skill
and if reliance has been placed on the exercise of that skill.
Under
the rule in MLC v Evatt (1969), a negligent statement by one
person will be actionable at the suit of a person to whom it is made,
whether or not there has been a contractual relationship between them
if their relationship possessed the following characteristics:
- that the maker of the
statement had made it in the ordinary course of his business or
profession; or
- that the subject matter of the
statement called for the exercise of some qualification, skill or
competence not possessed by the ordinary, reasonable man to which the
maker of the statement was known by the recipient to lay claim by
reason of his engaging in that business or profession (480).
The
carrying on of a business or profession which involves the giving of
advice of a kind which calls for special skill and competence is the
normal way in which a person lets it be known to the recipient of the
advice that he claims to possess that degree of skill and competence
and is willing to exercise that degree of diligence which is
generally possessed and exercised by persons who carry on the
business or profession of giving advice of the kind sought (482).
Those
persons such as accountants, surveyors, valuers and analysts whose
profession and occupation it is to examine books, accounts and other
things and to make reports on which other people - other than their
clients - rely in the ordinary course of business" may be held
liable for any loss sustained by a person acting on the faith of such
a report.
The
Privy Council further said:
Where
the adviser, although not carrying on the business of profession
generally has at or before the time at which his advice is sought let
it be known in some other way that he claims to possess skill and
competence in the subject matter of the particular inquiry comparable
to those who do carry on the business or profession of advising on
that subject matter and is prepared to exercise a comparable skill
and competence in giving the advice ...the law should require him to
make good his claim (482).
The
law does not distinguish between written formal valuations or
statements and oral or informal statements. The valuer can incur
liability equally as a result of any such statement or valuation
incautiously or negligently made and it does not matter whether or
not the person to whom the statement is made or letter written was
not a client or did not pay a fee for the advice given.
See:
valuation
law
sufficiency
of instructions
prepare
and provide instructions
access
to subject property
complexity
determine
assignment plan
valuation
report
determine
and negotiate fee
2